Double-edged sword

The double-edged sword is iron. Our bodies need it in order to function normally, but too much iron can increase the risk of developing cancer by promoting free radicals, and let’s also not forget that, once you have cancer, your cancer cells eagerly gobble up this metal, which is essential to their growth and wellbeing.

 

But too little iron can lead us to develop anaemia, which is one of the markers of active myeloma. Anaemia, in fact, is the “A” in the acronym “CRAB.” Can’t have too much..can’t have too little…hence, the double-edged sword bit…

 

It just so happens that, according to my most recent (April) test results, my serum iron and ferritin (ferritin, by the way, is a protein that binds to and stores iron that the body can use when needed) are the lowest they have ever been, as far as I know. In May I went to see my fabulous family doctor who didn’t see that as a sign of the myeloma kicking up any dust. No worries. What is important, he remarked, is that my haemoglobin and haematocrit are normal (they are). By the way, he was very pleased with my overall results. So am I.

 

He told me to take an iron supplement to increase my serum iron levels, but, as stubborn as an Alpine goat, I decided to wait for my next test results (still haven’t taken them, by the way). The reason for my stubbornness will be clear at the end of this post.

 

I should mention that I have been intending to write about curcumin and its effect on body iron for quite some time now, but other things have been getting in the way. Today I was finally inspired to look over a draft that I wrote back in March (!), when an Italian blog reader (grazie!) left me a comment pointing to a study on curcumin that might provide an explanation for my low iron levels. Sherlock did not have access to that particular journal, but she was able to hunt down and send me a couple of other studies.

 

The first study deals specifically with curcumin and iron. It’s titled Iron chelation in the biological activity of curcumin and was published in “Free Radical Biology & Medicine” in 2006. You can read the abstract here: http://tinyurl.com/3q9zzu

 

But first, what is iron chelation? The body cannot metabolize some heavy metals such as mercury and lead, and an accumulation of too much of this stuff can cause toxic effects, interfere with regular body functions etc. Heavy metals can be removed from the body using what are called chelating agents that bind to metals, hold on tightly to ‘em and finally expel them.

 

Apparently that is what curcumin does. As we can read in the above-mentioned abstract, ferritin protein levels decreased in cultured liver cells when curcumin was present. And Mice that were fed diets supplemented with curcumin exhibited a decline in levels of ferritin protein in the liver.

 

And now for a look at the full study, without overloading the post with details that I can barely grasp myself. The first part examines the well-known chemopreventive action of curcumin, so skip skip skip.

 

Then we get to the ferritin-iron-curcumin discussion. The jargon in this part is quite convoluted, hard to translate into simpler language. I did my best. Oh, before I forget: I skipped the part about the increase in GST, or glutathione S-transferase, in cultured liver cells, since that would have made this post way too long. But if you are interested in GST, let me know, and I will be glad to forward the entire study to you. Back to business, now.

 

The researchers suggest that iron chelation may be a novel mechanism that contributes to the potent cancer chemopreventive activity of curcumin. In their tests, curcumin activated IRPs, or iron regulatory proteins. These thingies get activated when iron levels decrease, for instance as a result of treatment with iron chelators. So far, so good.

 

The team examined the effect of curcumin on mice whose diet also contained some iron. One group was fed more curcumin, another less, and then there was the usual control (no curcumin) group: ferritin H and L proteins were both reduced to approximately 50% of control in mice receiving 2.0% dietary curcumin. (“H” stands for heavy, “L” for light.) I would like to mention that in no case were any adverse effects or toxicity observed as a result of the administration of curcumin to the mice.

 

The team also found that curcumin induced ferritin mRNA but reduced ferritin protein in cultured liver cells. Ehhh? I know, I know. But I found a rather simple (?) explanation (the link to this UC Berkeley study that I used in my March draft doesn’t work anymore, sorry about that!) that may help us figure out the difference between the two types of ferritin: iron accumulates in tissues in a solid, slow release form thanks to the ferritin protein. Ferritin protein manages iron and oxygen.

 

Ferritin mRNA instead has to do with genes, as the “mRNA” part suggests: A special structure in ferritin mRNA controls the synthesis rate of ferritin protein when iron has entered the cell. Okay, this is probably still not completely obvious to anybody without a scientific background, like yours truly. But the point is: curcumin’s ability to distinguish between the two types of ferritin—increasing the levels of the one (ferritin mRNA) but decreasing the levels of the other (ferritin protein)—suggests that it acts as an iron chelator, since iron chelators do the exact same thing.

 

Let’s have a look at the study results: One mechanism of action of synthetic chemopreventive agents is the induction of cytoprotective proteins. These include ferritin, a protein that functions as a cytoprotective protein by virtue of its ability to bind iron and reduce oxidative stress. And, just like chemotherapy, curcumin increases the levels of both subunits of mRNA ferritin, H (heavy) and L (light).

 

But, in contrast with chemo drugs, the levels of regular ferritin protein H and L declined to approximately 65% of control in cells treated with curcumin. That is quite a drop. The team demonstrated, however, that it is possible to reverse the trend, since iron depletion causes decreased levels of ferritin: If iron depletion underlies the curcumin-dependent decrease in levels of ferritin protein, then it should be possible to reverse the effect of curcumin on ferritin by repleting cells with iron. That is exactly what happened, and the researchers found that iron blocks curcumin-dependent ferritin repression.

 

At the end of the study we get to a very interesting bit of news. The researchers suggest that the intake of iron as a dietary supplement may bind to and interfere with the beneficial activity of curcumin. Aha! And, in fact, earlier in the study they write that iron was recently shown to attenuate the cytotoxic effects of curcumin in cultured squamous cell carcinoma. So iron renders curcumin less effective. Makes sense.

 

Well, after reading this study, I will not be taking an iron supplement…for now, at least. I cannot and indeed should not avoid iron completely (it’s in a lot of foods, of course), but I certainly don’t want to take anything extra that might interfere with curcumin’s anticancer activities…no way!

Cinquantaquattro…

Somehow all my students found out that tomorrow is my birthday. Not sure how that happened…I must have mentioned it in connection with my mother’s birthday. No matter.

 

At any rate, on Tuesday my most comical student, “Colleague C” (see my May 21st post, “All in good fun”), asked me: How old will you be on Friday?

  

I answered: Forty-seven.


She lapsed into Italian: Coooosa??? Cinquantaquattro??? (= “Whaaat??? Fifty-four???”)

 

I was momentarily at a loss for words…and it dawned on her that she had misunderstood, so she exclaimed: Aspetta un attimo (= “wait a second”), could you repeat, please?

 

I repeated, more slowly this time: Forty-seven.

 

A look of comprehension. Ah, ecco. Infatti stavo per dirti, ‘come li porti bene!’” (= “oh, I see. In fact, I was just about to tell you, ‘you look pretty good for your age!”).

 

Then she hesitated: Questo è peggio del pane con la muffina, vero? (= “This is worse than the mouldy bread incident, isn’t it?”)…

100,000 times stronger than curcumin…

I would like to mention that yesterday I updated my links to articles and studies, but mainly I put them in order by publication year. I hope that will make my blog more user-friendly (for me, too, eh…sometimes I have to do a search of my OWN blog to find stuff…!).

 

Now, let me explain the rather intriguing title of today’s post: the July 14 online edition of the Arizona Daily Star (http://www.azstarnet.com/metro/248162) had an article about a University of Arizona chemist, Prof. David Gang, who is currently studying the healthful effects of turmeric, ginger and sweet basil. Quick update: before posting this piece, I tested the above link and discovered that you have to register to read the article…a slight drag, even though said registration is free…(okay, I know I probably shouldn’t have done this…but I copied the article and would be happy to forward it upon request…no registration required…happy to do it…).

 

At any rate, Prof. Gang mentions the discovery of two other compounds found in the rhizome of turmeric that have up to 100,000 times the anti-inflammatory potency of curcumin. 100,000 times??? Now how come I wasn’t aware of this? Unfortunately, the names of these two compounds are not mentioned in the article…drat! I will have to put on my SR (=Serious Researching) cap at some point soon…

 

Prof. Gang has a holistic approach to health, which I very much appreciate, of course. And I was intrigued by his suggestion that adding turmeric to the diet would be more beneficial than taking a curcumin supplement: […] Gang believes it’s more beneficial to actually eat the spices than it is to take supplements of isolated compounds […] “You’re better off using it as part of your diet than waiting till you get sick and taking a supplement,” he said.

 

Truth be told, this is not the first time that I have considered the “spice versus active ingredient” business, but this may be the first time I have written about it.

 

My thoughts at this time: if your goal is to PREVENT an illness of some sort, even cancer, making dietary changes should be high on your list. I wish that years ago I had known what I know now. One of the things I would have changed entirely is my diet. But that milk is long spilt.

 

But what happens once you HAVE cancer? Is it enough to change your diet and add spices? Hmmm, I wonder. And I think Prof. Gang would be doubtful, too. Perhaps that might work for some types of cancer…but I am a bit too tired right now to start wading out into the deep end of the pool. wink smiley Of course, it’s never too late to change one’s lifestyle etc., and in fact, since my cancer diagnosis, I have made more than a few changes in my diet, which is still not perfect but is heaps better than before. And, especially during the winter months, I cook with truckloads of spices, such as turmeric, red pepper and ginger. But I also take supplements of isolated compounds. Is all this enough to keep me stable–my goal at present? Only time will tell…

 

An interesting experiment might be to stop taking curcumin for a couple of months and try just adding more spices to my daily diet. BUT: would I have the nerve to do that? STOP taking curcumin? The very idea gives me the quivers. Yikes…

 

By the way, Prof. Gang adds that a colleague of his is already looking to form a private company to develop pharmaceutical remedies from the compounds he isolates.

 

Spices for thought…

Saving kittens

This morning I have a cat story to tell. About a month ago, I heard the unmistakable, heart-chilling sound of desperate kittens crying. The noise was coming from my next door neighbour’s terrace. I peeked over the wall and saw my neighbour, a very sweet elderly lady, wringing her hands in distress. With tears in her eyes, she told me that a young mother cat had brought her six kittens there a few days earlier but had not been near them since the day before. The kittens were about ten days old. My neighbour didn’t know what to do. Well, at that late hour, neither did I.

 

I spent a nightmare-ridden night, tossing and turning, worrying about those kittens.

 

Early the next morning, after visiting the kittens and making sure that they had indeed been abandoned by the mother (there are signs you have to look for: for instance, if they are dirty and smelly it means that the mother hasn’t been cleaning them, etc.). No doubt about it. They had definitely been abandoned. No time to be wasted.

 

I confess that I have never nursed any kittens. Before being abandoned, even my tiny Priscilla was already more or less weaned. How could I possibly manage to nurse SIX kittens with no previous nursing experience?

 

So I got on the phone. I called every single Florentine animal protection agency I could find in the phonebook and online. I called all the cat and dog kennels. Almost everyone was sympathetic but couldn’t help me. The only advice I got was that if I wanted to save those kittens I would have to nurse them myself (that would have been my last resort, by the way; I would simply have taken time off work).

 

Well, I was determined to save those kittens. I called my vet who told me to get in touch with the National Association for the Protection of Animals (ENPA)…the man who answered the ENPA phone told me very sternly that according to Italian law those kittens could N-O-T be moved. Under any circumstances. They had to stay right where the mother had left them.

 

“So wait, I have to let them die of starvation, is that it?” I retorted angrily. “There is nothing else you can do. The kittens cannot be moved, period. It’s the law, signora,” he told me. What kind of cruel law is that??? And this is supposed to be an animal protection agency??? But I didn’t have the time to argue with this guy.

 

Time was running out.

 

I hung up and finally got in touch with the “gattare,” who are mainly female volunteers that take care and feed the stray cat “colonies” in Florence. The very kind gattara I spoke with told me that she had a volunteer who just might agree to take on so many kittens. This was someone, she reassured me, who had already successfully nursed kittens that young. The gattara called me back within a few minutes, telling me that this woman, whom I will name Gianna, had said yes. Joy!

 

My very distraught neighbour was thrilled to hear this bit of news. Like me, she has never had to deal with kittens abandoned this early by their mother (my neighbour has eight adult cats of her own, by the way).

 

A word or two in the mother cat’s defence: I don’t think she had enough milk for all those babies. I read online that sometimes mother cats, especially inexperienced ones like this one, are overwhelmed by large litters and can abandon them. Nature is cruel, but there you go.

 

Anyway, Gianna, who lives with five cats, all saved from a cruel fate, arrived here soon after we spoke by phone and took the kittens home. During the first few critical days, she kept them wrapped up in a shawl and slept with them to keep them warm. She fed them every 3-4 hours and also treated them for intestinal parasites.

 

I am thrilled to report that they all survived.

 

Gianna has fallen in love with all the kittens, but mainly with the smallest and weakest one, a little white and orange tabby that she barely managed to save. She is going to adopt him and has found excellent homes for the others among her family and friends. Smiley face

 

Gianna and I have been in touch by phone almost daily, and I am going to visit her and the kittens on Monday (I hope I remember to take my camera!). Oh, I have asked her to teach me how to nurse and wean kittens. She has enthusiastically agreed, so that if something like this happens again I will be equipped and prepared to take care of the kittens myself.

 

This is a case of abandonment by an inexperienced mother cat. I started to add a few paragraphs about the cruel but unfortunately common practice of abandoning pets before the summer holiday season, but I decided that this should be a celebratory post…so I want to end on a positive note, which is that the six kittens are alive and already doing what kittens do, playing and being mischievous and whatnot.

 

My heartfelt thanks to all the magnificent Giannas in the world!

“Why is it so?”

I came across a colourful article on curcumin and turmeric in the July issue of “Men’s Health”: http://tinyurl.com/654lqk It was written by a reporter who travelled to India to find out more about turmeric. Among other things, he describes his visits to India‘s largest producer of ingredients for the flavor and fragrance industry (where turmeric is processed, too), to a small turmeric farm and also to a spice shop in Kerala:

 

When I visit Kannan Balachandran, 34, who owns a small spice shop in Kochi, Kerala, he produces a large bowl of turmeric, over which he muses, “I have seen my granny, when the children get a cut, put it in the wound. When a chicken became ill, I saw her mix it with rice and feed it.”

 

Shagzil Khan, 29, a tour guide, listens and nods. “It is just something we know,” he says. “No one teaches you this. There’s never any asking, ‘Why is it so?’ “

 

There was nothing in this article that I didn’t already know, but anyway, it is a good read if you have a few minutes to spare, so please have a look. If nothing else, it will tell you why we don’t ever see any curcumin commercials! wink smiley

 

Have a great weekend!!!

MRI results, audits and Pandas

I have been super busy with work commitments in the past few days and haven’t had the time to do any research or write any posts. The company where I teach English, you see, had an important health and safety audit, and since the common language was English (the auditors were French and knew no Italian) I was asked to be the official interpreter.

 

There were some amusing moments, I have to admit (during which I couldn’t even crack a smile, of course), such as when we were in the company lab and one of the auditors remarked to the chemist in charge of the lab: So, you are responsible for the dangerous substances in the company. You are a professional, you are a chemicalSmiley face I just love it when things like this happen (oh, and by the way, over lunch I tried my rusty French on the auditors and made a few mistakes, perhaps even funnier than this one…yes, we had a few good laughs there…).

 

Getting to the less interesting business of my MRI results, I just wanted to say that they turned out fine. I have a few small hernias here and there and some age-related arthritis. Nothing new.

 

And in fact there have been “no substantial changes” since May of 2005, the date of my last spinal MRI. I am pleased.

 

I am also pleased to report that I have a new car. It’s a yellow My new Fiat PandaFIAT Panda (see photo; it is parked in front of our house). I loved my old Mazda, too, but the brakes were beginning to…go. The FIAT dealership gave us a zero interest financial plan (can’t beat that!), which is the main reason we decided to go ahead and buy this car. Its colour, by the way, is “optimistic yellow.” Absolutely purrrfect for moi! Smiley face

 

I’m thrilled to bits. I already adore my Panda. What a great car!

Not just for asthma sufferers…

According to a recent Science Daily article (see: http://tinyurl.com/5v6xxo), researchers at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Med School have discovered a molecule called resolvin E1 (RvE1) produced by the body from omega-3 fatty acids that helps resolve and prevent respiratory distress in laboratory mice. This molecule is found in cold-water fish (salmon, mackerel and, ugh, anchovies) and is produced by the body in response to the onset of inflammation. The abstract can be read here: http://xrl.us/kj8qf.

 

The experts still do not completely understand why fish oil is so effective against inflammation: increased levels of omega-3 fatty acids are associated with lower asthma prevalence in people, but the mechanisms to support that observation are poorly understood.

 

But the main thing is: omega-3 fatty oils are effective against asthma.

 

One thing led to another, and I found myself involved in a bit of research that I hadn’t intended to do (happens a lot to me…Smiley face). Completely by chance, in fact, I came upon a study by a team of Japanese researchers on the same topic–asthma, mice and RvE1–a study published in March 2008 (see: http://tinyurl.com/6xaddo), that is, a few months before the publication of the study reported in Science Daily. The Japanese researchers discovered the exact same thing about RvE1.

 

So, just for the heck of it, I did a search on PubMed for RvE1 and asthma, and found another study (full version available for free here: http://tinyurl.com/5d64sa) published back in 2005 (!!!) on the protective anti-inflammatory effect of this molecule, and on the role it has in preventing (drum roll!) osteoclast-mediated bone destruction in periodontitis (= a severe form of gum disease).

 

Osteoclasts? Why, those are the hyperactive bone-destroyers in multiple myeloma…! At that point, I had a look at the full study, where I read that bone loss in periodontitis is caused by osteoclast activity. The researchers discovered that the animals (sigh) with periodontitis that were treated with RvE1 had only a few osteoclasts compared to the untreated ones. Conclusion: RvE1 inhibits osteoclasts. Well, well! (I just hope that the “animals” involved in this study were tiger mosquitoes…)

 

Another excerpt tells us that periodontitis has pathogenic features similar to those observed in other inflammatory diseases such as arthritis. And read this: Resolvins are a new family of bioactive products of omega-3 fatty acid transformation circuits initiated by aspirin treatment that counter proinflammatory signals. Because it is now increasingly apparent that local inflammation plays a critical role in many diseases, including cardiovascular disease, atherosclerosis, and asthma, experiments were undertaken to evaluate the actions of the newly described EPA-derived Resolvin E1 (RvE1) in regulation of neutrophil tissue destruction and resolution of inflammation. The results were that RvE1, used as a topical pharmacologic agent, was found to prevent the progression of tissue destruction

 

Treatment with RvE1 was more effective and less damaging than the chronic use of antibiotics. Interesting. The researchers propose that regulating inflammation with molecules such as RvE1 is a rational new therapeutic approach to the treatment of osteoclast-mediated bone disease. Aha!!!

 

It turns out that there are 32 studies in PubMed on RvE1. The earliest study dealing with the specific anti-inflammatory activity of these so-called resolvins, as far as I can tell, dates to 2004. But the above-mentioned Science Daily article led me to believe that RvE1 was a startling NEW discovery. Why would that be? Well, I have learned my lesson. From now on, whenever I see exclamations such as “exciting new discovery…,” I will do a background check. There just might be a less publicized precedent…as happened with the IRF4 studies…

 

Now for my own personal experience. I have suffered from asthma for years. I know the main source of my trouble: cats. I am very allergic to cats, but I am also a huge cat-lover (life is unfair, sometimes…!) and now have four cats. When Stefano and I went to Northumberland in April I didn’t have one asthma attack, not even with all the walking we did. I didn’t use my cortisone inhaler or my Ventolin. Why? No cats. Simple.

 

My non-cat loving friends think I’m nuts. They don’t understand that the benefits of having cats in my life far outweigh the inconvenience of having to use a cortisone inhaler once a day (I would like to mention that in the pre-curcumin period I was much worse off, and used cortisone and Ventolin quite a lot).

 

Recently, though, I haven’t needed to use my inhaler. As for Ventolin, well, I haven’t used it in a long time. Is it a coincidence that I have started taking a fish oil supplement in recent months? After reading about RvE1, I think the answer to that question is “no.” 

 

So my fish oil intake is probably inhibiting my overly eager osteoclasts…and it has gotten rid of my asthma…at least for now…

Hey, that means I can adopt another cat! Hehe…just kidding! (or am I?) wink smiley

IRF4 addiction in multiple myeloma

For an introduction to IRF4 please see my June 27th post. Now, let’s see, the full “Nature” study starts with a discussion of a genetic method to identify therapeutic targets in cancer in which small hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) that mediate RNA interference are screened for their ability to block cancer cell proliferation and/or survival. The researchers used myeloma cells lines from three molecular subtypes.

 

Hairpin whaaats? Molecular subwhaaaats? I had to look up all this stuff even though I suspected that the latter had to do with all the different types of myeloma (truth be told, I didn’t find out that there were different types of myeloma until quite recently…in fact, before my diagnosis, I used to think that leukaemia was just one type of cancer…who’d ever heard of Hairy Cell Leukemia, Acute Myelogenous Leukemia or Acute Megakaryocytic Leukemia? Indeed, come to think of it, who’d ever heard of…Multiple Myeloma??? Ahhh, how things change…). Anyway, I found a lot of information about different myeloma subtypes online. I am not going to bother with small RNA hairpins…I never use hairpins anyway…well, okay, I used ’em on my wedding day, nine years ago…but that is IT! wink smiley

 

Myeloma subtypes. A UAMS communication (http://tinyurl.com/ssheh) tells us that in 2006 seven genetic subtypes of myeloma were identified among 414 myeloma patients. Of those seven subtypes, four were associated with better patient outcomes following high-dose chemotherapy and a stem cell transplantation. Ok, but what happened to the other three? I am curious. At some point I really should take a look at the full study, which is available for free online: http://tinyurl.com/3eqm6l

 

I also read the presentation (see: http://tinyurl.com/3efgjp) given by Dr. Rafael Fonseca at the island of Kos 2007 International Myeloma Workshop. Myeloma, he says, is not a homogenous type of cancer, but many well defined variants exist. And these variants can best be examined by looking at genetic/cytogenetic markers. The idea is that genetic testing should be useful in figuring out what kind of treatment would be the best for a particular subtype. Targeted treatment, in other words. Interesting concept…that we will come across again later…

 

Back to the IRF4 study. It is very technical, and I confess that I got lost at times among the various translocations and missense substitutions and fourth introns and coding regions…but a few things were clear, such as the following: The knockdown of IRF4 killed ten myeloma cell lines, but had a minimal effect on five lymphoma cell lines. Knockdown, by the way, is simply a technique used to reduce the expression of one of more genes. For instance, remember the mutant tumour-suppressor p53? Well, when this evil mutant form is “knocked down,” cancer cells become less aggressive. Anyway, the upshot is that ten myeloma cell lines were annihilated when IRF4 was knocked down. Excellent!

 

The researchers point out that the myeloma cell lines they tested bear many of the recurrent genetic aberrations typical of this cancer, including genetic abnormalities that activate the NF-kB pathway. Ah. So here we have another thing that triggers the infamous NF-kB…good to know, I suppose (sigh). Reading this study made me wish to have more genetic testing…this may be another matter I will discuss with my haematologist this fall (as much as I hate BMBs, it might be worth having another one…).

 

Back to the study. The myeloma lines tested were like drug addicts badly in need of a fix, which was provided by a perfectly normal (not aberrant, that is) IRF4. The researchers wanted to understand the molecular basis for this dependence, so they looked at genetic changes in the myeloma lines after IRF4 was knocked down. They noticed that 308 genes became down-regulated (down-regulation is the process whereby a response to a stimulus is reduced or suppressed. For instance, curcumin down-regulates the hyperactive transcription factor NF-kappaB in cancer cells).

 

The researchers then examined normal haematopoietic (= blood or blood-forming) cells that require high IRF4 expression, including plasma cells […] and dendritic cells, and found that IRF4 regulates a broader set of genes in myeloma than in individual haematopoietic subsets. So myeloma gives IRF4 the chance to expand its standard genetic network. And Mr. Normal Nice Guy IRF4 thus becomes Mr. Normal But Not So Nice Guy IRF4.

 

The paragraph continues: Roughly one-quarter of the IRF4 target genes in myeloma were upregulated in activated B cells but not plasma cells, including genes known to be important in cellular growth and proliferation, such as MYC. I looked up MYC on Wikipedia and discovered that the mutated or over-expressed form of this gene can cause cancer. EEK!

 

I also found the following: Myc is activated upon various mitogenic signals such as Wnt, Shh […]. Activated by Wnt and Shh…wait a sec, those are signaling pathways that are crucial for the survival of cancer stem cells! Could cancer stem cells somehow be involved, here? There is no mention of cancer stem cells in the study so I have no way of answering that question. The more I think about it, the more it seems doubtful…oh well.

 

Anyway, according to the IRF4 study, MYC has a prominent role in the pathogenesis of myeloma. But when the activity of IRF4 was reduced, the levels of MYC mRNA also decreased by more than twofold in myeloma cell lines and caused MYC DNA-binding activity to decrease in nuclear extracts of myeloma cells. So it would seem that if you block IRF4 you also block MYC (and vice versa), and this process will eventually lead to the death of myeloma cells.

 

The researchers also discovered that IRF4 and MYC are co-dependent: Our data suggest that the oncogenic activation of MYC in myeloma upregulates IRF4, which in turn drives expression of MYC and other IRF4 target genes. A vicious cycle, in other words. Probably not an easy cycle to interrupt, I would imagine.

 

Another interesting sentence: […] the dependency of myeloma on IRF4 may be best described as ‘non-oncogene addiction’; that is, the aberrant function of a normal cellular protein that is required for cancer cell proliferation or survival. The loss of IRF4, they add, results in ‘death by a thousand cuts’. I like the sound of those last five words!

  

Another important observation: the reduction of the activity of IRF4 by only 50% (!!!) is enough to kill myeloma cells without harming healthy cells: a ~50% knockdown of IRF4 mRNA and protein was sufficient to kill myeloma cell lines. Wow.

 

The researchers are optimistic. At the end of the study they speculate that an IRF4-directed therapy might kill myeloma cells while sparing normal cells, and hope that IRF4 can be exploited as an Achilles’ heel of multiple myeloma. Too early to tell…but interesting.

 

Cancer symposium. It just so happened that yesterday an international symposium on cancer genotypes and phenotypes (see: http://tinyurl.com/6dxpnv) took place right here in Florence. Today is the second (final) day of the symposium. I found out too late to attend the session that was open to the public yesterday afternoon but watched a local news report last night indicating that the current tendency in oncology is to move away from toxic treatments in favour of targeted treatments based on a molecular approach (aha!). You can read the symposium program here (circadian rhythms were also discussed!): http://tinyurl.com/6hv2oz

 

Exciting times…!