Curcumin and pancreatic cancer trial results

A few days ago Prof. Aggarwal’s senior administrative assistant sent me a message with an unexpected and very welcome attachment: the full report (yippee!) on the pancreatic cancer-curcumin clinical trial that has been taking place at MD Anderson in Texas. The report was published in the July 15 issue of “Clinical Cancer Research” (see abstract:


This was a Phase II study to determine whether oral curcumin has biological activity in patients with pancreatic cancer. Let’s skip all the introductory parts describing pancreatic cancer and then curcumin and go have a look at the “Results.”


The average age of the 25 patients enrolled in the study was 65. No treatment-related toxic effects were observed. To date, one patient remains stable for >18 months and another patient had a dramatic but brief tumor response. The former patient had previously undergone a failed Whipple’s surgery followed by gemcitabine and radiation for locally advanced disease. Curcumin decreased this particular patient’s CA125 level (CA125 is the abbreviation for Cancer Antigen 125, which is elevated in many types of cancer, but apparently and surprisingly not that common in myeloma), the size of his lesions remained stable, and indeed there has been a decrease in the standardized uptake value in those lesions from a baseline level of 10.6 to a level of 5.7 after 12 months of therapy.


The report continues: One patient had a brief but marked response (73% reduction in tumor size by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) that lasted 1 month […]. Interestingly, at the time of progression, the lesions that had regressed remained small, but other lesions grew larger. This patient also had a rapid and dramatic increase in cytokine levels (IL-6, IL-8, IL-1RA, and IL-10). When I read this last sentence, I confess to having felt slightly alarmed…Then I read the following: Conceivably, this occurred because of release of cytokines from the tumor associated with shrinkage. Oh, phew! Relief!


The discussion regarding this particular patient continues later on: Also, of potential importance in this patient is the observation that the tumors that originally regressed continued to show regression during the follow-up period on curcumin, whereas the tumors that grew were the ones that had been small originally. This observation suggests that there was a malignant clone responsive to curcumin, whereas another resistant clone emerged.


In contrast, the patient who has appeared to have benefited most from treatment with curcumin (patient 14) has had slow improvement over 1 year and a gradual decrease in cytokine levels […]. Of interest, patient 14 had the highest baseline levels of IL-1RA of any of the study patients. IL-1RA stands for “Interleukin 1 receptor antagonist” and is the natural antagonist of the pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1alpha and interleukin-1beta (from Wikipedia).


Okay, in sum, this means that two patients appeared to have biological activity of curcumin after treatment. That sounds even less encouraging than the myeloma-curcumin study at first glance…BUT, after treatment with curcumin, a decline in NF-kB, STAT3 and COX-2 was observed, and that is important, methinks.


I was particularly interested in the test results of the patients taking 8 grams of curcumin/day: Although we found little, if any, free or unconjugated curcumin in these patients’ plasma, we easily detected levels of curcumin following digestion of plasma with combined glucuronidase and sulfatase enzymes. This is consistent with data suggesting that curcumin is present in plasma in conjugated (glucuronide and sulfate) forms. […] Plasma levels of drug released from conjugated derivatives of curcumin on day 1 of dosing decreased on average to 22 to 41 ng/mL from 2 to 6 h after the first dose of curcumin […]. This simply means that the curcumin that enters our body is transformed into conjugate forms, whose levels continue to decrease as time passes.


There is a lot of detail in this 9-page study. I couldn’t possibly summarize it or quote it all. But I think many of us are chiefly interested in the issue of bioavailability, which is dealt with on pages 7-8: only low levels of curcumin are detectable in plasma (steady-state level at day 3 is ~22-41 ng/mL). Nevertheless, some of the patients had biological activity of curcumin as evidenced by the antitumor effects noted above in two patients and by effects on cytokine levels and on NF-kB, COX-2, and pSTAT3 […]. Conceivably, the limited bioavailability of curcumin attenuated the response rate, because exposure to microgram amounts of curcumin is required to show antiproliferative effects in vitro. It is also possible that circulating curcumin levels do not reflect tumor tissue curcumin levels.


Ah, now this is what I have suspected (or hoped!) for quite some time: curcumin may be barely detectable in the bloodstream, but that doesn’t mean that it isn’t working on some different level…This thought seems to be confirmed by the following: It has been suggested previously that systemic levels of drug may not reflect drug levels actually present in tissues of interest. Although at least one study has examined curcumin levels in colon tissue of mice after oral administration, few, if any, studies have analyzed curcumin or curcumin metabolites in malignant human tissues. This is important: few, if any, studies have analyzed curcumin or curcumin metabolites in malignant human tissues.


The study continues with an unwelcome bit of news: However, the researchers add that even though the levels of NF-kB and COX-2 were decreased by curcumin, this did not translate into a clinical response. Bummer…


Conclusion: as we know, oral curcumin is well tolerated at doses for of 8 grams for up to 18 months (in my case, much longer than that!). And, even though our body doesn’t absorb it very well, biological activity is evident. This is an important statement.


The problem as far as pancreatic cancer is concerned is that higher levels of exposure need to be achieved. Curcumin is hydrophobic and therefore cannot be given i.v. However, because it is lypophilic, it can be encapsulated in a liposome, and such a preparation would allow i.v. administration, leading presumably to higher circulating levels of curcumin. Lipophilic…meaning that it dissolves in fats and oils. Okay, we already knew that, but read the following:


The researchers suggest that liposomal curcumin or other better formulations of curcumin may provide more consistent blood levels with better pharmacologic effect. And, (drum roll) they are developing liposomal curcumin for clinical trials.


Well, until liposomal curcumin is available, I will probably go back to my kitchen this fall and try to come up with another palatable fat-based concoction containing curcumin C3 Complex powder.


Blog-related “business”: I appreciate all the comments I have received recently. Thank you! I have been super busy these past few days, working hard and whatnot, and that is the reason why I haven’t gotten in touch with everyone privately, as I try to do (when I have more time). Sorry!


Personal note: I wrote this post in a bit of a hurry because Stefano and I are getting ready to leave for a brief holiday in the Apennine mountains. We will be back in Florence on Sunday. Have a great weekend, everyone! Smiley face


  1. Thank you for finding and explaining that article. I have been taking some curcumin for a month or two now, and its good to see that at least something does make it to the bloodstream. Has any other study actually measured this amount before?

    But there are other questions which I’m wondering whether the full article addresses. I am still not convinced of the best way to take curcumin. How was it administered in this study? With food, or on an empty stomach? With or without bioperine? It sounds as if these researchers have the means to investigate and optimize the best way of oral administration. Have they?

    I take it on an empty stomach, with some cod liver oil. But people who use turmeric in cooking are obviously taking it with food and probably getting some anti-cancer benefit.

    Thank you for a very informative and well written website.

    Pennsylvania, USA

  2. Yana: I guess that 18 months was the duration of the trial, that’s all.

    Tony: I don’t know how curcumin was taken by these patients. As soon as I have some time I will go over the study again, and if I find an answer to your question I will let you know.

    I take it on an empty stomach, too, with fish oil. And I use turmeric in my cooking, to boot.

    Other studies have measured amounts, for instance the MD Anderson myeloma patient trial whose results were published a few months ago.

    I am in a hurry now, so this is not very helpful, sorry. In the fall I will have more time to answer questions (maybe!).

    Take care!

  3. Its a good article ,i have few doubts on curcurmin ,
    1.What is max dose we can take curcurmin pre day?
    2.How can i increase the solubility in water ?
    3.In any article i find uses only i do like to know about side effects.


  4. I am new to this, my husband was diagnosed almost two months ago with Pancreatic Cancer, being treated in a phase II trial at Sloan and hopefully surgery to follow if no spread. I am greatly interested in tumeric curcumin. I was told that the best way to assimiliate if you are doing this at home, is to eat fat (cream cheese, olive oil) with liberally sprinkled fresh pepper (pepperine) and then a minute or two later take 2000-2500mg tumeric curcumin with fishoil. We have been doing this. In addition, has anyone an opinion on an acid PH and its link to carcinoma? Can it really be as simple as raising your PH? I understand that something like baking soda cannot get “into” a cancer cell, but sugar can, therefore, mixing 3 parts maple syprup to one part baking soda is suggested. I feel that I can read 24 hours a day in an affort to help my husband, because I don’t believe conventional chemotherapy is effective in killing pancreatic cancer cells and he needs something, anything that can help.

  5. Just wanted to add that my husband had his eight week CT scan and it not only showed NO spread, but a decrease in the tumor size. Two doctors at Sloan could not stop smiling and it wasn’t hard for us to see this was a rare occurance. Rightly or wrongly, because of the dismal response to chemotherapy when someone has pancreatic cancer, I can’t help but think the Curcumin has a part in this good outcome. He is scheduled for the whipple in two weeks. He has also gained 12 pounds since diagnosis, which is a result of a high caloric, low refined sugar diet. Someone at Sloan even asked if he could have possibly been misdiagnosed because he is doing so well. I know, I know, things could turn around in a heartbeat, but for now, we’re going to continue what we’ve been doing…Thanks for the information!

  6. Hi…following up to my last note: My husband is 7 months post diagnosis – still on Curcumin every day, although now I buy Super Curcumin because I read that is what they use at MD Anderson and it contains pepper. His last CT scan was completely negative. He is weak but his labs are great. I believe with all my heart that Curcumin made the difference. If anyone reading this has anything to help educate me or info to share, please email me:
    Thanks – Janet

  7. Hi Janet m, Just wondering how your husband is doing. My mother was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in February and has gone the conventional route with no good results to speak of.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *